Our happy, peaceful world
There's been a lot of news on terrorism recently, and as usual, a lot of hot air and not much facts.
For instance, when the IRA was in a more active phase some years ago, most people were under the impression that the goals were fairly clear: 1) A united Ireland and 2) Brits out of Northern Ireland. The goal seemed relatively simple and realistic on paper and amongst most of the British populace there was probably some sympathy with the idea (even if they didn't agree with their methods). The rules seemed to be a campaign to be directed against the British govt with high-ranking politicians and members of the Royal Family legitimate targets. Every so often people would get caught in the crossfire or a splinter group outside of the main wing would commit an atrocity, but in general the ordinary population was not a target.
With Al-Queida however, nobody seems to know what their objectives are - world Islam? Total destruction of western civilisation? Which seem totally ridiculous aims. And now the civilian population is the target. Then there are people who say that ‘they’ mustn’t change our way of living (whatever that’s supposed to mean). The Industrial Revolution drastically changed our way of life, as did the invention of the railways, WW2, email and mobile phones, the motor car…so of course crime and terrorism is going to change our way of life. The only realistic solution is more security, more police and more police powers.
3 Comments:
A good point about what changes our world, but the issue here is that once we start to up our alert we panda to those who wish to creat a climate of fear. This is achieve step by step. The first being the publics fear of a new threat. This can then spiral to the point of a police state and sense of division. The prudent policy to the stop the first steps is by reassuring the public and those that do not see the bigger picture and the methods used by Al-Kida. Sweeping moves and statements by politicians make for worrying headlines, even to me, when papers like the daily mail need no encoragement. There is no real need to fear. The security services have the situation contained at this point in time and i see that continuing. As for the level of threat it was the IRA that attacked are prime minister and killed hundreds a year but we are more concerned about 10 people average a year. Perhaps it is to do with race, the war abroad or just we have little or no understanding of the motivations of the enemy. Either way we must be careful and educate.
To be fair to the IRA, they had a semi-legitimate grievance against the British govt. To target civilians is un-excusable.
Yes I don't agree with the headline-grabbing hysteria of the Daily Mail (and The Express is even more extreme) and I don't really think the threat of terrorism in the UK is anywhere near the levels in, say, Israel or Iraq.
But the level of organised and disorganised crime has been steadily increasing since the 1960s with no end in sight and the last 15 years have seen an unprecedented level of violent crime. The police always seem powerless to do much for fear of litigation from criminals and most people have lost all faith in the criminal justice system.
Thankfully now that these rather dull/depressing topics are being discussed on blogs it will mean less at the pub!
Hurrah!!
:)
Post a Comment
<< Home